Uwais Iqbal • 2023-02-22
AI seems to be on the tips of everyone’s tongues. With such a complex and new technology, it’s easy to get drawn into the hype and hysteria. The sad but unfortunate reality is that not many people really understand what AI is, nor do they know how to speak about it or think about its applications in the legal sector. We want to change that. AI has already started to penetrate our personal lives and it is only a matter of time until it becomes ubiquitous in our professional lives. AI is coming and we should embrace this new technology in a posture of knowledge and transparency instead of a posture of ignorance and hype. In this article we'll do some groundwork to define what AI is, explore how to think about AI and learn how it can be applied in the legal industry. Let’s get started!
Let’s take a moment to define our terms. There tends to be lots of buzzwords and jargon floating around with AI. You’ve probably heard terms like Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Natural Language Processing being thrown about. Let’s actually define what we mean by these terms so we’re not just throwing around empty words and adding to the hype and hysteria.
In 1956, one of the founding fathers of AI, John McCarthy, defined artificial intelligence as “machines that can perform tasks that are characteristic of human intelligence”. What is meant by human intelligence in the definition is a bit opaque.
We can take a crack at the definition and think of artificial intelligence as a “technique that uses machines to replicate the problem-solving and decision-making capabilities of the human mind”. The artificial part means that it's pure mimicry and imitation. The intelligence part means that it captures some human ability of problem-solving or decision-making.
The natural question that arises is: How are machines leveraged to mimic the capabilities of the human mind? The answer to this question gives rise to two different ways AI can be done:
There are a couple of different senses of AI that we can draw out from how AI is normally spoken about and used in everyday language:
A common categorisation of the different kinds of AI is based on what the AI system is capable of doing. Researchers usually break AI down into two kinds: Strong AI and Weak AI.
We’ve already seen that Machine Learning (ML) is a branch of AI that uses data to enable machines to learn how to perform specific tasks as a human would do. ML uses data.
Natural Language Processing (NLP) is another branch of AI that enables computers to understand human language in both written and verbal forms. NLP looks at language. NLP is of particular relevance to legal because the underlying medium of the legal is text.
Deep learning is a branch of Machine Learning where algorithms are made up of several layers of neurons to mimic the structure of the brain to allow patterns to be learnt from data. Deep Learning uses neural networks with data.
With a newfound and long-awaited understanding of what AI means and how it is used in everyday language, we can do some hype busting!
You've probably heard the claim that “AI will replace lawyers”. It certainly grabs attention and is great for headlines. But is there any truth to that claim? As we've just seen, AI can be used in different senses and there are different kinds of AI. Which sense of AI does this claim use and which kind of AI is this claim referring to? Take a moment to review the different senses and see if you can figure it out before reading on ahead!
The claim that “AI will replace lawyers” uses AI in the sense of Superintelligence. It’s obvious that if we had AI systems that were as intelligent as humans we could replace lawyers with AI counterparts. The reality is that AI systems aren’t that smart. In effect, it's a claim about Strong AI. Strong AI systems are still a theoretical estimation - we don’t know if we’ll ever get to a point where machines are just as intelligent and capable as human beings. Lawyers are still around today despite Weak AI systems being used in the legal sector for a number of years. I don’t think we’ll ever get to Strong AI so it’s fair to say that lawyers will be sticking around and won’t be going anywhere!
Now we have developed some grounding in the terms related to AI, we can take a step further to explore how AI is used in industry.
It’s worth noting that there are different contexts for where AI can be done. There are two main contexts that we need to be aware of:
Take the recent uproar around Chat-GPT. Chat-GPT is an AI model developed by Open AI that is currently in open beta for testing with the public. Chat-GPT is an example of AI in a research context - there are virtually no restrictions around data privacy or confidentiality and it was trained on a virtually unlimited budget. It’ll be a while before Chat-GPT makes its way into industry focused software and applications.
We are interested in how AI can be used in an industry context. One intuitive way to think about applied AI in an industry context is to think of it as a way to capture and scale expertise. There are things that you as a human have to do because they require a level of learned skill or expertise. Take for example, identifying the termination clause in a contract. You can train an AI system by teaching it what a termination clause looks like so that it captures your expertise. Then, since the AI system is a machine, you can scale it to operate at volume and find the termination clause in a massive collection of contracts.
All this talk about AI is great. But how can I tell if AI can be used to help me in my day-to-day legal work? An easy way to answer this question is to think about AI as though it has some sort of agency. Of course, we mean this in a metaphorical sense. Literally speaking, an AI algorithm is just a bunch of numbers. Thinking about AI as though it has agency means you should behave with AI as you would with a person with a particular skill set. You wouldn’t randomly employ a complete stranger into your team just because she is popular? So why do we try and do the same with AI?
Before hiring someone into our team, we’d usually sit down and think about what skills, traits and experience the right person would have. Then we’d interview a bunch of applicants and decide who best fits our requirements. Only then we’d hire them into our team and onboard them to make sure they are as effective as possible. We have to undertake a similar process with AI. We have to define a job spec, evaluate potential algorithms and when we find one that works, we have to work to integrate it within the wider team and organisation.
We tend to see AI as this all-encompassing technology which can solve all of our problems. This is far from the truth. We have to think about AI in the same way we think about hiring a new employee who can come into our organisation to carry out a very particular and precise job. So the question which naturally arises is what jobs can AI do? We can characterise an AI solution by what action it can perform ie the job it can do. Within Legal AI there are a small number of relevant actions that AI can perform well.
We’ve seen that AI can perform particular and precise actions e.g. to extract information or classify a document. There is also another aspect concerning the approach. In other words, how will AI be used to carry out the particular task at hand? It’s a common fallacy to conflate AI with automation. AI can be used to automate an action, but there are other functions AI can perform depending on the circumstance.
To better understand the functions AI can perform, we need to introduce two concepts:
We can now put together a risk-volume matrix to understand the different approaches of AI. The risk/volume matrix is a framework for determining the function AI can perform under different scenarios with respect to risk and volume.
There are four different AI Functions:
Getting clear on the function AI should perform will inform the choice of model, the extent of user interaction as well as the data requirements for the AI model.
The AI Action can be combined with the AI Function to create an AI Job Spec that captures what the AI should do and how it should do it. The AI Job Spec should also capture what the minimum acceptable performance is so that the AI, just as every other employee, can be assessed on whether it is succeeding or failing at its job.
We tend to fear what we don’t understand. Technology is already complex enough and AI shifts how we look at the world. We are all using the same buzzwords but are speaking entirely different languages. The first step to adopting and embracing such a radically novel and revolutionary technology like AI is to develop the language and ideas so we can think about and speak about AI in a meaningful way. Undoubtedly, there are endless applications where AI can be applied in legal but we will never be ready for that revolution if we speak different languages.
This article was originally published in the Modern Lawyer Journal